Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
| От | Kevin Grittner |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 504DDA16020000250004A11F@gw.wicourts.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > In fact, most of the folks who would want an embedded PostgreSQL > either want no authentication at all, or only a single password. > So supporting authentication options other than trust or md5 is > not required, or desired AFAIK. I don't know whether it's worth the trouble of doing so, but serializable transactions could skip all the SSI predicate locking and conflict checking when in single-connection mode. With only one connection the transactions could never overlap, so there would be no chance of serialization anomalies when running snapshot isolation. The reason I wonder whether it is worth the trouble is that it would only really matter if someone had code they wanted to run under both normal and single-connection modes. For single-connection only, they could just choose REPEATABLE READ to get exactly the same semantics. -Kevin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: