Re: patch for parallel pg_dump
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: patch for parallel pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4F749FFF.3080101@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: patch for parallel pg_dump (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/28/2012 11:43 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > On 03/28/2012 09:12 PM, Joachim Wieland wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net> >> wrote: >>> But your patch hasn't got rid of them, and so it's declared twice. >>> There is >>> no pgpipe.h, BTW, it's declared in port.h. If VC2005 doesn't >>> complain about >>> the double declaration then that's a bug in the compiler, IMNSHO. >>> Doesn't it >>> even issue a warning? I no longer use VC2005 for anything, BTW, I >>> use VC2008 >>> or later. >> I agree, the compiler should have found it, but no, I don't even get a >> warning. I just verified it and when I add a #error right after the >> prototypes in port.h then it hits the #error on every file, so it >> definitely sees both prototypes and doesn't complain... cl.exe is >> running with /W3. >> >> src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_archiver.c >>> Anyway, ISTM the best thing is just for us to get rid of pgpipe without >>> further ado. I'll try to get a patch together for that. >> Thanks. > > > OK, I have committed this. Following that, you need to add a couple of > macros for pipewrite to parallel.c. There's also a missing cast in the > call to beginthreadex(). > > I'll continue testing tomorrow. > > Here is an updated patch that builds now that pgpipe has been removed. cheers andrew
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: