Re: patch for parallel pg_dump
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: patch for parallel pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4F73DA6E.5080300@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: patch for parallel pg_dump (Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: patch for parallel pg_dump
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/28/2012 09:12 PM, Joachim Wieland wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: >> But your patch hasn't got rid of them, and so it's declared twice. There is >> no pgpipe.h, BTW, it's declared in port.h. If VC2005 doesn't complain about >> the double declaration then that's a bug in the compiler, IMNSHO. Doesn't it >> even issue a warning? I no longer use VC2005 for anything, BTW, I use VC2008 >> or later. > I agree, the compiler should have found it, but no, I don't even get a > warning. I just verified it and when I add a #error right after the > prototypes in port.h then it hits the #error on every file, so it > definitely sees both prototypes and doesn't complain... cl.exe is > running with /W3. > > src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_archiver.c >> Anyway, ISTM the best thing is just for us to get rid of pgpipe without >> further ado. I'll try to get a patch together for that. > Thanks. OK, I have committed this. Following that, you need to add a couple of macros for pipewrite to parallel.c. There's also a missing cast in the call to beginthreadex(). I'll continue testing tomorrow. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: