Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4DC5F64B.4010103@2ndQuadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/06/2011 04:06 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > FWIW, I did move pg_config from -devel to the "main" (really client) > postgresql package in Fedora, as of 9.0. That will ensure it's present > in either client or server installations. Eventually that packaging > will reach RHEL ... > We should make sure that the PGDG packages adopt that for 9.1 then, so it starts catching on more. Unless Devrim changed to catch up since I last installed an RPM set, in that 9.0 it's still in the same place: $ rpm -qf /usr/pgsql-9.0/bin/pg_config postgresql90-devel-9.0.2-2PGDG.rhel5 While Peter's question about whether it's really all that useful is reasonable, I'd at least like to get a better error message when you don't have everything needed to compile extensions. I think the shortest path to that is making pg_config more likely to be installed, then to check whether the file "pg_config --pgxs" references exists. I'll see if I can turn that idea into an actual change to propose. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: