Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?

On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 21:47 -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
> On 05/06/2011 04:06 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > FWIW, I did move pg_config from -devel to the "main" (really client)
> > postgresql package in Fedora, as of 9.0.  That will ensure it's
> present
> > in either client or server installations.  Eventually that packaging
> > will reach RHEL ...
> >
>
> We should make sure that the PGDG packages adopt that for 9.1 then, so
> it starts catching on more.  Unless Devrim changed to catch up since I
> last installed an RPM set, in that 9.0 it's still in the same place:
>
> $ rpm -qf /usr/pgsql-9.0/bin/pg_config
> postgresql90-devel-9.0.2-2PGDG.rhel5

I'm not sure that I can move it to main package in 9.0 package set, I
need to make sure that I won't break anything. But it is pretty doable
for 9.1.

Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org  Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz