Re: Top five challenges
От | silly sad |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Top five challenges |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4D79111C.4090604@bestmx.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Top five challenges (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Top five challenges
Re: Top five challenges |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 03/10/11 20:48, Adrian Klaver wrote: > On 03/10/2011 09:15 AM, silly sad wrote: >> On 03/10/11 20:07, Adrian Klaver wrote: >>> On 03/10/2011 08:53 AM, silly sad wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> Well, 'epoch' clearly is a point in time with the hour being >>>>> midnight at >>>>> GMT, so I don't see a problem with epoch making such an adjustment: >>>> >>>> >>>> great! the flexible epoch! >>>> >>>> when do want to point an epoch to? >>>> just set timezone and enjoy. >>>> >>> >>> I am not sure what your point is. >> >> my point is: >> >> SELECT extract('epoch' from 'epoch'::timestamp); > > Simplest explanation is you are comparing a time zone aware datetime > 'epoch' to an unaware one 'epoch'::timezone. The second one, since it > is not anchored to a time zone is taken to be local time and the result > you get is the interval in seconds between the two. (1) do u really believe in this? (2) why didn't u try the select i wrote?
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: