Re: Top five challenges
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Top five challenges |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4D790FEF.2030703@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Top five challenges (silly sad <sad@bestmx.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: Top five challenges
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 03/10/2011 09:57 AM, silly sad wrote: > On 03/10/11 20:48, Adrian Klaver wrote: >> On 03/10/2011 09:15 AM, silly sad wrote: >>> On 03/10/11 20:07, Adrian Klaver wrote: >>>> On 03/10/2011 08:53 AM, silly sad wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, 'epoch' clearly is a point in time with the hour being >>>>>> midnight at >>>>>> GMT, so I don't see a problem with epoch making such an adjustment: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> great! the flexible epoch! >>>>> >>>>> when do want to point an epoch to? >>>>> just set timezone and enjoy. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I am not sure what your point is. >>> >>> my point is: >>> >>> SELECT extract('epoch' from 'epoch'::timestamp); >> >> Simplest explanation is you are comparing a time zone aware datetime >> 'epoch' to an unaware one 'epoch'::timezone. The second one, since it >> is not anchored to a time zone is taken to be local time and the result >> you get is the interval in seconds between the two. > > (1) do u really believe in this? > (2) why didn't u try the select i wrote? Yes I did. -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@gmail.com
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: