Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C62C781.1090004@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/11/2010 11:42 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On ons, 2010-08-11 at 10:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> One of us is missing something. I didn't say to run the checks using >> the >>> configured port. I had in mind something like: >>> port = 0xC000 | ((PG_VERSION_NUM + DEF_PGPORT)& 0x3FFF); >> Oh, I see, modify the DEF_PGPORT don't just use it as-is. OK, except >> that I think something like the above is still pretty risky for the >> buildfarm, because you would still have conflicts for assorted >> combinations of version numbers and branch_port settings. >> >> How about just this: >> >> port = 0xC000 | (DEF_PGPORT& 0x3FFF); > The version number was put in there intentionally, for developers who > work on multiple branches at once. That's the whole reason this code > exists. Please don't remove it. > Do they run "make check" by hand simultaneously on multiple branches? That's the only way you'd get a collision here, I think. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: