Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1281541324.26522.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment
Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On ons, 2010-08-11 at 10:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > One of us is missing something. I didn't say to run the checks using > the > > configured port. I had in mind something like: > > > port = 0xC000 | ((PG_VERSION_NUM + DEF_PGPORT) & 0x3FFF); > > Oh, I see, modify the DEF_PGPORT don't just use it as-is. OK, except > that I think something like the above is still pretty risky for the > buildfarm, because you would still have conflicts for assorted > combinations of version numbers and branch_port settings. > > How about just this: > > port = 0xC000 | (DEF_PGPORT & 0x3FFF); The version number was put in there intentionally, for developers who work on multiple branches at once. That's the whole reason this code exists. Please don't remove it.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: