Re: review: xml_is_well_formed

On 03/08/10 16:15, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On lör, 2010-07-31 at 13:40 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> Well-formedness should probably only allow XML documents.
>>
>> I think the point of this function is to determine whether a cast to
>> xml will throw an error.  The behavior should probably match exactly
>> whatever test would be applied there.
>
> Maybe there should be
>
> xml_is_well_formed()
> xml_is_well_formed_document()
> xml_is_well_formed_content()
>
> I agree that consistency with SQL/XML is desirable, but for someone
> coming from the outside, the unqualified claim that 'foo' is well-formed
> XML might sound suspicious.

What about making the function sensitive to the XML OPTION, such that:

test=# SET xmloption TO DOCUMENT;
SET
text=# SELECT xml_is_well_formed('foo');
  xml_is_well_formed --------------------  f (1 row)

test=# SET xmloption TO CONTENT;
SET
text=# SELECT xml_is_well_formed('foo');
  xml_is_well_formed --------------------  t (1 row)

with the inverse for DOCUMENTS? To me this makes the most sense as it makes the function behave much more like the
otherxml functions.
 

-- 
Mike Fowler
Registered Linux user: 379787