Re: review: xml_is_well_formed

On lör, 2010-07-31 at 13:40 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Well-formedness should probably only allow XML documents.
> 
> I think the point of this function is to determine whether a cast to
> xml will throw an error.  The behavior should probably match exactly
> whatever test would be applied there.

Maybe there should be

xml_is_well_formed()
xml_is_well_formed_document()
xml_is_well_formed_content()

I agree that consistency with SQL/XML is desirable, but for someone
coming from the outside, the unqualified claim that 'foo' is well-formed
XML might sound suspicious.