Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B7CA585.6000905@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > >> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> * Fix large object support in pg_dump. I think this is just waiting >>> for a second opinion on whether the approach is correct. I've been >>> meaning to look at it, but haven't gotten enough round tuits; maybe >>> someone else would like to take a look? This is an open item, so we >>> should really try to deal with it. >>> > > >> Yeah, I think this is a "must fix for alpha" item. Will look at it >> tomorrow, god willin an the creek don't rise (or, given the weather >> around here: the power stays on). >> > > I've applied that patch after some revisions. > > The only thing still showing as open in the CommitFest webpage is > the last plperl patch. I think that's actually done but not marked > as committed; Andrew? > > > sorry. fixed. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: