Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22156.1266456745@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> * Fix large object support in pg_dump. I think this is just waiting >> for a second opinion on whether the approach is correct. I've been >> meaning to look at it, but haven't gotten enough round tuits; maybe >> someone else would like to take a look? This is an open item, so we >> should really try to deal with it. > Yeah, I think this is a "must fix for alpha" item. Will look at it > tomorrow, god willin an the creek don't rise (or, given the weather > around here: the power stays on). I've applied that patch after some revisions. The only thing still showing as open in the CommitFest webpage is the last plperl patch. I think that's actually done but not marked as committed; Andrew? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: