Re: lock_timeout GUC patch

Jaime Casanova írta:
> 2010/1/13 Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>:
>   
>> Tom Lane írta:
>>     
>>> If this patch is touching those parts of relcache.c, it probably needs
>>> rethinking.
>>>
>>>       
>> What I did there is to check the return value of LockRelationOid()
>>     
>
> the hunk was because a diference in the position (i guess patch accept
> a hunk of reasonable size, assuming there is something like a
> reasonable size for that)
>   

Actually the reject was not because of the position difference,
Tom's refactor changed one line in load_critical_index():

-        ird = RelationBuildDesc(indexoid, NULL);
+        ird = RelationBuildDesc(indexoid, true);

-- 
Bible has answers for everything. Proof:
"But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more
than these cometh of evil." (Matthew 5:37) - basics of digital technology.
"May your kingdom come" - superficial description of plate tectonics

----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
http://www.postgresql.at/