Re: lock_timeout GUC patch

2010/1/13 Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>:
> Tom Lane írta:
>>
>> If this patch is touching those parts of relcache.c, it probably needs
>> rethinking.
>>
>
> What I did there is to check the return value of LockRelationOid()

the hunk was because a diference in the position (i guess patch accept
a hunk of reasonable size, assuming there is something like a
reasonable size for that)

and is not touching the same as your refactor (sorry if i explain myself bad)

> and also elog(PANIC) if the lock wasn't available.
> Does it need rethinking?
>

well, i actually think that PANIC is too high for this...

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157