Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project
От | Ron Mayer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B2E86BF.1050705@cheapcomplexdevices.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project (Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh@pop.jaring.my>) |
Ответы |
Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project
Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project |
Список | pgsql-general |
Lincoln Yeoh wrote: > Ten or so years ago MySQL was better than Postgres95, and it would have > been easy to justify using MySQL over Postgres95 (which was really slow > and had a fair number of bugs). But Postgresql is much better than MySQL > now. That's just my opinion of course. Really?!? MySQL development started in '94; and their first internal release was May 95.[1] At that time Postgres's SQL language support was new, but didn't the underlying database already have a half decade of history that surely was more mature than MySQL at the time? I thought the main justification for MySQL back then is that they had better Win95 support (and a quality control philosophy that more matched the old pre-NT windows that favored time-to-market over correctness). [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MySQL#cite_note-21
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: