Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project
От | Lincoln Yeoh |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200912201505.nBKF55IG069220@vsmtp6.jaring.my обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project
Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project |
Список | pgsql-general |
At 05:44 AM 12/17/2009, Greg Smith wrote: >You've probably already found >http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Why_PostgreSQL_Instead_of_MySQL:_Comparing_Reliability_and_Speed_in_2007 >which was my long treatment of this topic (and overdue for an update). > >The main thing I intended to put into such an update when I get to >it is talking about the really deplorable bug handling situation for >MySQL, which is part of how all the data corruption issues show >up. There's a good overview of its general weirdness at >http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/08/12/what-would-make-me-buy-mysql-enterprise/ >and the following series of pages lead you through my favorite set of bugs: More so when Monty himself grumbles about the bug handling situation: http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2008/11/oops-we-did-it-again-mysql-51-released.html If people still insist on MySQL, you might want to get it in writing that it's someone else's decision to use MySQL and not yours ;). Ten or so years ago MySQL was better than Postgres95, and it would have been easy to justify using MySQL over Postgres95 (which was really slow and had a fair number of bugs). But Postgresql is much better than MySQL now. That's just my opinion of course. Link
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: