Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4AD63F37.2090303@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?
Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 04:51:03PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Rod Taylor <rod.taylor@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> I tried making a functional index based on an expression >>> containing the 2 argument regexp_matches() function. Is there a >>> reason why this function is not marked immutable instead of >>> normal? >>> >> regex_flavor affects its result. >> > > Speaking of which, can we see about deprecating and removing this GUC? > I've yet to hear of anyone using a flavor other than the default. > > > You have now. I have a client who sadly uses a non-default setting. And on 8.4, what is more. There are more things under heaven and earth .... cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: