Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?
От | David Fetter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20091014210734.GA14790@fetter.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?
Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 04:51:03PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Rod Taylor <rod.taylor@gmail.com> writes: > > I tried making a functional index based on an expression > > containing the 2 argument regexp_matches() function. Is there a > > reason why this function is not marked immutable instead of > > normal? > > regex_flavor affects its result. Speaking of which, can we see about deprecating and removing this GUC? I've yet to hear of anyone using a flavor other than the default. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: