Re: CREATE LIKE INCLUDING COMMENTS and STORAGES
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CREATE LIKE INCLUDING COMMENTS and STORAGES |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4AC7F94B.8050907@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CREATE LIKE INCLUDING COMMENTS and STORAGES (Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: CREATE LIKE INCLUDING COMMENTS and STORAGES
Re: CREATE LIKE INCLUDING COMMENTS and STORAGES |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Itagaki Takahiro wrote: > I removed hunks by sql_help.c and fix a typo in documentation. > An updated patch attached. > > Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> With the sql_help.c changes removed, the patch applied fine and >> testing went well. >> >> I noticed only the following in the new documentation in CREATE TABLE: >> - <literal>INCLUDING DEFAULTS INCLUDING CONSTRAINTS INCLUDING INDEXES INCLUDING STORAGES INCLUDING COMMENTS</literal>. >> + <literal>INCLUDING DEFAULTS INCLUDING CONSTRAINTS INCLUDING INDEXES INCLUDING STORAGE INCLUDING COMMENTS</literal>. >> >> Aside from the bogus hunks in the patch, and this one typo, the patch >> looks to be in excellent shape. >> I'm reviewing this patch with a view to committing it, since the other patch I was going to look at still seemed to be subject to some discussion. In general it looks OK, but I'm wondering why we are not copying comments on cloned indexes. I realize that might involve a bit more code, but I think I'd feel happier if we cloned all the comments we reasonably could from the outset. Is it really that hard to do? cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: