Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A3BED8B-FE9E-4C16-A6C2-D9664071BD9E@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I don't think worrying about the message we send to users is reasonable. We can take responsibilty for the messages we output but punishing our users to teach them a lesson is being actively user- hostile greg On 3 Sep 2008, at 15:52, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Hannu Krosing wrote: >> On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 16:50 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> Gregory Stark wrote: >>>> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > >> Are you really afraid that someone would want to use mb to mean >> millibits ? >> As SQL is generally case insensitive, it is quite surprising to most >> people that GUC units are not. > > We have had this discussion before, I even submitted a patch to make > them case insensitive. In retrospect I was wrong to submit that > patch. SQL may be case insensitive but units are not. MB != Mb != > mb , I don't think we should encourage in any way for users to do > the wrong thing. > > Sincerely, > > Joshua D. Drake > > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: