Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48BEA4B6.50705@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code (Hannu Krosing <hannu@krosing.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hannu Krosing wrote: > On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 16:50 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> Gregory Stark wrote: >>> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > Are you really afraid that someone would want to use mb to mean > millibits ? > > As SQL is generally case insensitive, it is quite surprising to most > people that GUC units are not. We have had this discussion before, I even submitted a patch to make them case insensitive. In retrospect I was wrong to submit that patch. SQL may be case insensitive but units are not. MB != Mb != mb , I don't think we should encourage in any way for users to do the wrong thing. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: