Re: Time to start the PR machine
От | Javier Soltero |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Time to start the PR machine |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4A059996-E7AC-4636-A762-1D07B2195D0C@hyperic.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Time to start the PR machine (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Time to start the PR machine
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Ouch :) I did read the release, man. Sorry if that didnt come through in my comments. I just wanted to advocate we stick to mentioning the license in the "ABOUT" section rather than calling it out in every announcement. ___________________________________ Javier Soltero Hyperic | www.hyperic.net o- 415 738 2566 | c- 415 305 8733 javier.soltero@hyperic.net ___________________________________ On Sep 30, 2005, at 10:20 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: > Javier, Josh, Mitch, etc.: > > >> How about instead looking at this issue by trying to define a >> short statement about postgres which should be included in every >> release, >> > > You know, all of your feedback would be *much* more useful if you > actually read the release I have up, currently. I'll repeat, > because nobody on *this* thread has once referred to this fact: > > The "ABOUT POSTGRESQL" statement contains a mention of the BSD > license and its business-friendliness. > > Now, all of you, please read the release and make comments on > what's actually there, thanks. > > http://pgfoundry.org/docman/view.php/1000047/85/release.txt > > The question is not whether we need to mention our license. > That's already there. It's whether it needs more emphasis than > it's already getting, like the phrase "released under the flexible > BSD license" in the first paragraph. > > --Josh > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster >
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: