Re: Time to start the PR machine
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Time to start the PR machine |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 433D73C4.3040705@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Time to start the PR machine (Javier Soltero <javier.soltero@hyperic.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Time to start the PR machine
Re: Time to start the PR machine |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Javier, Josh, Mitch, etc.: > How about instead looking at this issue by trying to define a short > statement about postgres which should be included in every release, You know, all of your feedback would be *much* more useful if you actually read the release I have up, currently. I'll repeat, because nobody on *this* thread has once referred to this fact: The "ABOUT POSTGRESQL" statement contains a mention of the BSD license and its business-friendliness. Now, all of you, please read the release and make comments on what's actually there, thanks. http://pgfoundry.org/docman/view.php/1000047/85/release.txt The question is not whether we need to mention our license. That's already there. It's whether it needs more emphasis than it's already getting, like the phrase "released under the flexible BSD license" in the first paragraph. --Josh
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: