Re: Closing some 8.4 open items
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49DE3D5C.1040109@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/9/09 10:42 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >>> Tom Lane wrote: >>>> Peter Eisentraut<peter_e@gmx.net> writes: >>>>> Here is my thinking, and considering that that would basically involve a >>>>> forward-looking design decision right now, I would support dropping the >>>>> cardinality() function from 8.4 (if people agree that this is in fact the >>>>> design decision to make). >>>> At this point I'd support that too. >>> +1 >> Since there were no objections, and there is no time left before beta1, >> I'm going to go ahead and remove cardinality(). > > Do we want a TODO? > No, I don't think so. It would just be a tag-on to whatever TODO we already have about implementing multisets and collections. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. www.pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: