Re: Closing some 8.4 open items

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> >>> Here is my thinking, and considering that that would basically involve a 
> >>> forward-looking design decision right now, I would support dropping the 
> >>> cardinality() function from 8.4 (if people agree that this is in fact the 
> >>> design decision to make).
> >> 
> >> At this point I'd support that too.
> 
> > +1
> 
> Since there were no objections, and there is no time left before beta1,
> I'm going to go ahead and remove cardinality().

Do we want a TODO?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +