Re: 1.10 beta 1
| От | Ashesh Vashi |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: 1.10 beta 1 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 49B8D1AE.9020002@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: 1.10 beta 1 (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
| Ответы |
Re: 1.10 beta 1
|
| Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Hi Guillaume,
Thanks for reviewing the patch.
Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
But, I could not find the direct dependency of the sequence on the table.
I need some guidance for it.
Could you please help on this?
Thanks for reviewing the patch.
Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
I think - you're right.Ashesh Vashi a écrit :Hi Dave, Please find the patch for the Dependency bugI just checked this patch. I find disturbing that it finds a dependency to a nextval function instead of a dependency to the sequence. Moreover, the first table has two dependencies : on the sequence and on the nextval function of this sequence.
But, I could not find the direct dependency of the sequence on the table.
Definitely, even I felt the same.This patch is a first step, but I think we need to go further.
I need some guidance for it.
Could you please help on this?
--
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: