Re: autovacuum and reloptions

Alvaro Herrera escreveu:
>> (ii) I think we should change the expression "storage parameters" for
>> something else because autovacuum is related to maintenance. My suggestion is
>> a general expression like "relation parameters";
> 
> I'm not sure I agree with this idea, because the term "storage
> parameter" has been used for several releases already.  This would be a
> relatively major terminology change.
> 
I don't buy your argument. 'fillfactor' is a _storage_ parameter but
'autovacuum_enabled' is not. I don't like terminology changes too but in this
case it sounds strange calling autovacuum_* as storage parameters.


--  Euler Taveira de Oliveira http://www.timbira.com/