Re: autovacuum and reloptions

On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Euler Taveira de Oliveira
<euler@timbira.com> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera escreveu:
>>> (ii) I think we should change the expression "storage parameters" for
>>> something else because autovacuum is related to maintenance. My suggestion is
>>> a general expression like "relation parameters";
>>
>> I'm not sure I agree with this idea, because the term "storage
>> parameter" has been used for several releases already.  This would be a
>> relatively major terminology change.
>>
> I don't buy your argument. 'fillfactor' is a _storage_ parameter but
> 'autovacuum_enabled' is not. I don't like terminology changes too but in this
> case it sounds strange calling autovacuum_* as storage parameters.
>

+1

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157