Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 494DFC0D.4000108@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> Gregory Stark wrote: >>> A vacuum being replayed -- even in a different database -- could trigger the >>> error. Or with the btree split issue, a data load -- again even in a different >>> database -- would be quite likely cause your SELECT to be killed. >> Hmm, I wonder if we should/could track the "latestRemovedXid" separately >> for each database. There's no reason why we need to kill a read-only >> query in database X when a table in database Y is vacuumed. > > What about shared catalogs? True, vacuums on shared catalogs would affect read-only queries on all databases. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: