Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20081220230954.GC3989@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items
Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Gregory Stark wrote: >> A vacuum being replayed -- even in a different database -- could trigger the >> error. Or with the btree split issue, a data load -- again even in a different >> database -- would be quite likely cause your SELECT to be killed. > > Hmm, I wonder if we should/could track the "latestRemovedXid" separately > for each database. There's no reason why we need to kill a read-only > query in database X when a table in database Y is vacuumed. What about shared catalogs? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: