Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
От | Gabriele Turchi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 493E96E4.4010505@l39a.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives? ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
We reached a fairly good performance on a P400 controller (8 SATA 146GB 2,5" 10k rpm) with raid5 or raid6 Linux software raid: the writing bandwidth reached about 140 MB/s sustained throughput (the hardware raid5 gave a sustained 20 MB/s...). With a second, equal controller (16 disks) we reached (raid6 spanning all 16 disks) about 200 MB/s sustained. The CPU load is negligible. Reading performance is about 20% better. Best regards and my apologies for my bad English. GT P.S.: on a P800, 12 SATA 750GB 3,5" 7200 rpm, the hardware raid5 writing performance was about 30 MB/s, software raid5 is between 60 and 80 MB/s. Scott Marlowe ha scritto: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:17 AM, Mario Weilguni <mweilguni@sime.com> wrote: >> Alan Hodgson schrieb: >>>>>>> Mario Weilguni <mweilguni@sime.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>> strange values. An individual drive is capable of delivering 91 >>>>> MB/sec >>>>> sequential read performance, and we get values ~102MB/sec out of a >>>>> 8-drive RAID5, seems to be ridiculous slow. >>> >>> What command are you using to test the reads? >>> >>> Some recommendations to try: >>> >>> 1) /sbin/blockdev --setra 2048 device (where device is the partition or >>> LVM volume) >>> >>> 2) Use XFS, and make sure your stripe settings match the RAID. >>> >>> Having said that, 102MB/sec sounds really low for any modern controller >>> with 8 drives, regardless of tuning or filesystem choice. >>> >>> >> First, thanks alot for this and all the other answers. >> >> I measured the raw device performance: >> dd if=/dev/cciss/c0d0 bs=64k count=100000 of=/dev/null >> >> I get poor performance when all 8 drives are configured as one, large >> RAID-5, and slightly poorer performance when configured as JBOD. In >> production, we use XFS as FS, but I doubt this has anything to do with FS >> tuning. > > Yeah, having just trawled the pgsql-performance archives, there are > plenty of instances of people having terrible performance from HP > smart array controllers before the P800. Is it possible for you to > trade up to a better RAID controller? Whichever salesman sold you the > P400 should take one for the team and make this right for you. >
Вложения
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: