Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"
От | justin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 493460FE.1060105@emproshunts.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again" (Geoffrey <lists@serioustechnology.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Geoffrey wrote: > Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Steve Crawford >> <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com >> <mailto:scrawford@pinpointresearch.com>> wrote: >> >> >> http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2008/11/oops-we-did-it-again-mysql-51-released.html >> >> >> All interesting, but especially the part about half-way down under >> the heading "So what went wrong with MySQL 5.1 ?" - must-read for >> anyone involved in selecting a database. >> >> >> well, at least they have replication and partitioning built in. How >> reliable it is, is completely another story - but still, they are a >> step ahead in that regard. Now I know why Tom Lane doesn't have a >> blog :) > > Actually, he has a couple of them: > > pgsql-general@postgresql.org > admin@postgresql.org > . > . > > :) > I'm very happy and proud to use Postgresql as the developers working on Postgresql deliver a quality product, not claim its quality.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: