Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"
От | Geoffrey |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 49344C55.3070108@serioustechnology.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again" ("Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz" <gryzman@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"
Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again" |
Список | pgsql-general |
Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Steve Crawford > <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com <mailto:scrawford@pinpointresearch.com>> > wrote: > > http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2008/11/oops-we-did-it-again-mysql-51-released.html > > All interesting, but especially the part about half-way down under > the heading "So what went wrong with MySQL 5.1 ?" - must-read for > anyone involved in selecting a database. > > > well, at least they have replication and partitioning built in. How > reliable it is, is completely another story - but still, they are a step > ahead in that regard. > Now I know why Tom Lane doesn't have a blog :) Actually, he has a couple of them: pgsql-general@postgresql.org admin@postgresql.org . . :) -- Until later, Geoffrey Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Benjamin Franklin
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: