Re: Why does pg_ctl.c have its own copy of PM_VERSIONSTR?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why does pg_ctl.c have its own copy of PM_VERSIONSTR? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 47BC9996.7040602@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Why does pg_ctl.c have its own copy of PM_VERSIONSTR? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why does pg_ctl.c have its own copy of PM_VERSIONSTR?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Why isn't pg_ctl.c using PG_VERSIONSTR from miscadmin.h? Seems like > this is something that will have to be kept in sync manually (I see > from the CVS logs that Peter already had to do that once). > > If the feeling is that miscadmin.h is a backend include file that > shouldn't be used by pg_ctl (which is not totally unreasonable, > though I think there's no harm in it given the current contents > of that file), maybe we should move PG_VERSIONSTR someplace else? > > > Your opinion of my memory at nearly 4 years remove is way too high :-) I don't even know if that was my doing or Bruce's - probably mine though. It looks like I adapted it from initdb.c - that would make sense given the time frames. There is unlikely to be any deep reason. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: