Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4794D82B.3070904@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10? (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: >>> I read that Perl 5.10 is about to hit Fedora rawhide. Anyone know if >>> it will work with plperl and/or DBD::Pg? If there are fixes needed >>> in plperl, it'd sure be nice if they were in 8.3 ... >>> >> >> I've tested 5.10 against both and they seem to work fine. My plperl >> tests >> are not necessarily thorough, but it compiled smoothly and ran a >> bunch of >> plperlu code without a problem. DBD::Pg worked fine, all its tests >> passed. >> >> >> > > For plperl, we need to test at least: > > * standard plperl regression tests > * the UTF8 problem we recently fixed > > First news is not good. On my test we have failed one of the regression tests - the "use strict" processing seems to be backwards. I will try to get to the bottom of it. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: