Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4794B4A0.6000509@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10? ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?
Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: >> I read that Perl 5.10 is about to hit Fedora rawhide. Anyone know if >> it will work with plperl and/or DBD::Pg? If there are fixes needed >> in plperl, it'd sure be nice if they were in 8.3 ... >> > > I've tested 5.10 against both and they seem to work fine. My plperl tests > are not necessarily thorough, but it compiled smoothly and ran a bunch of > plperlu code without a problem. DBD::Pg worked fine, all its tests passed. > > > For plperl, we need to test at least: * standard plperl regression tests * the UTF8 problem we recently fixed I can check this out later today. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: