Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog??
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog?? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4788.1290402707@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog?? (Lou Picciano <loupicciano@comcast.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog??
Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog?? |
Список | pgsql-admin |
Lou Picciano <loupicciano@comcast.net> writes: > Sure - of course - performance, too! It just seems like such an obvious candidate for a configurable option; I'm a bitsurprised it isn't in there... L It *is* configurable: make pg_xlog a symlink. The reason we don't handle this via postgresql.conf is that you could too easily shoot yourself in the foot by breaking the link between a data directory and its xlogs. There are no postgresql.conf entries that say destroy_all_my_data_immediately_please = on but that's more or less what an easily changeable pg_xlog pointer would be. In short: this is not something to change if you don't know what you're doing. If you do, you should be able to handle it using the mechanism provided. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: