Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog??
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog?? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201101202327.p0KNRqU21459@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: binary logs: a location other than pg_xlog?? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
Tom Lane wrote: > Lou Picciano <loupicciano@comcast.net> writes: > > Sure - of course - performance, too! It just seems like such an obvious candidate for a configurable option; I'm a bitsurprised it isn't in there... L > > It *is* configurable: make pg_xlog a symlink. The reason we don't > handle this via postgresql.conf is that you could too easily shoot > yourself in the foot by breaking the link between a data directory > and its xlogs. There are no postgresql.conf entries that say > destroy_all_my_data_immediately_please = on > but that's more or less what an easily changeable pg_xlog pointer > would be. > > In short: this is not something to change if you don't know what > you're doing. If you do, you should be able to handle it using > the mechanism provided. Old thread, but no one mentioned that initdb has an option to create a symlink for you for pg_xlog: -X directory, --xlogdir=directory This option specifies the directory where the transaction log should be stored. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: