Re: whats the deal with -u ?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: whats the deal with -u ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 475C8BD8.90408@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: whats the deal with -u ? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: whats the deal with -u ?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> >>> The manual explains it: >>> This option is deprecated, as it is conceptually flawed. (Prompting for a >>> non-default user name and prompting for a password because the server >>> requires it are really two different things.) You are encouraged to look >>> at the -U and -W options instead. >> Hmm. The point about the forced password prompt is certainly valid, >> but I see nothing wrong with the idea of having an option to prompt >> for the username. What if we just took out the forced password prompt, >> on the grounds that you can get that with "-u -W" if you want it? > > Yes, undeprecating it then makes sense. > > I have never understood what's the point of having an option to force a > password prompt. I wonder why don't we deprecate -W? As I recall there was a bug under very specific circumstances that a password prompt would not appear. Thus we added the option for -W. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: