Re: whats the deal with -u ?
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: whats the deal with -u ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20071210003750.GA5624@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: whats the deal with -u ? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: whats the deal with -u ?
Re: whats the deal with -u ? Re: whats the deal with -u ? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes: > > > The manual explains it: > > This option is deprecated, as it is conceptually flawed. (Prompting for a > > non-default user name and prompting for a password because the server > > requires it are really two different things.) You are encouraged to look > > at the -U and -W options instead. > > Hmm. The point about the forced password prompt is certainly valid, > but I see nothing wrong with the idea of having an option to prompt > for the username. What if we just took out the forced password prompt, > on the grounds that you can get that with "-u -W" if you want it? Yes, undeprecating it then makes sense. I have never understood what's the point of having an option to force a password prompt. I wonder why don't we deprecate -W? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.advogato.org/person/alvherre "Cada quien es cada cual y baja las escaleras como quiere" (JMSerrat)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: