Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review
От | Mark Kirkwood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 470C6C80.6090909@paradise.net.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote: > > Personally, I want to see Jan contribute more, not less. The link with > Slony and related replication technology is critically important to > Postgres, which is why Jan has spent so long on it. > > Generally we should be encouraging everybody to contribute; the project > must have an orientation towards action and growth if we are to survive. > If Jan had not done this, would there have been a storm of protest? > > > +1 Having said that, the fact that the discussion happened in a forum other than -hackers is clearly something to be avoided in future (ISTR something similar happening with some changes coming from Bizgres a while ago). I don't know how we can avoid this sort of thing happening every now and again, except to encourage folk to include -hackers in their discussions before sending the final patch in (Bruce and others have stated this previously - maybe we need to re-iterate it few weeks *before* every feature freeze...) Cheers Mark
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: