Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1191966332.4233.82.camel@ebony.site обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review
Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 17:13 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I go back to my original question, do you understand the process that > has to be followed for patch submission/application, and that it > applies to all of us, including you? I think you're braking a little hard here. Nothing bad has happened has it? My understanding of committing stuff was about taking responsibility for what's in there. Jan definitely has the knowledge and track record to be trusted, plus we know he has time to fix any mistakes. That close to release, only Core members should be doing that and Jan is Core. Personally, I want to see Jan contribute more, not less. The link with Slony and related replication technology is critically important to Postgres, which is why Jan has spent so long on it. Generally we should be encouraging everybody to contribute; the project must have an orientation towards action and growth if we are to survive. If Jan had not done this, would there have been a storm of protest? Anyway, its a good release and its out now. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: