Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Streaming Onlinebackup (Maybe OFFTOPIC)
От | Markus Schiltknecht |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Streaming Onlinebackup (Maybe OFFTOPIC) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46E165CC.6030308@bluegap.ch обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Streaming Onlinebackup (Maybe OFFTOPIC) (apoc9009 <apoc9009@yahoo.de>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, apoc9009 wrote: > Translation for you: > A Backup is a File or Set of Files thadt contains the Data of your > Business critical Informations. > It should not be Archived on the same place, the same House or the same > Room. I disagree, a backup does not necessarily have to be a single file or a set of files. Wikipedia has this definition: "backup refers to making copies of data so that these additional copies may be used to restore the original after a dataloss event." While for "replica", it states: "replica is a copy that is relatively indistinguishable from the original" Thus a backup can very well be thought of as replica, and vice versa. > A Replication Database has nothing to do with a Backup, it works only > for Failover if the Primary > Database has a Mailfunction. That's certainly plain wrong, see multi-master replication where failover doesn't make any sense. Wikipedia again (although that's unfair, as I've contributed to that definition myself) [1]: "Replication is the process of sharing information so as to ensure consistency between redundant resources" ..for example a master database and a backup. > Keep in Mind: Backup is NOT Replication! > Write it down 100 times and maybe you understand A backup IS a replica. A backup IS a replica. A backup IS a replica. A backup IS a replica... Regards Markus [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_%28computer_science%29
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: