Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Streaming Onlinebackup (Maybe OFFTOPIC)
От | apoc9009 |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Streaming Onlinebackup (Maybe OFFTOPIC) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46E156CC.7020905@yahoo.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Streaming Onlinebackup (Maybe OFFTOPIC) (Markus Schiltknecht <markus@bluegap.ch>) |
Ответы |
Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Streaming Onlinebackup (Maybe OFFTOPIC)
Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Streaming Onlinebackup (Maybe OFFTOPIC) Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Streaming Onlinebackup (Maybe OFFTOPIC) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Markus Schiltknecht schrieb: > Hi, > > apoc9009 wrote: >> Thadt is Replication NOT Backup > > I've now read all of your messages in this thread, but I simply fail > to understand why you are that much opposed to the term 'replication'. > I think the only thing which comes any close to what you're looking > for is replication (in particular eager multi-master replication). What is your Problem in understanding the Word "Backup"? Translation for you: A Backup is a File or Set of Files thadt contains the Data of your Business critical Informations. It should not be Archived on the same place, the same House or the same Room. A Replication Database has nothing to do with a Backup, it works only for Failover if the Primary Database has a Mailfunction. A good Backuptool is needed if you have Databases with sizes over 1 Terrabyte. The common Backup methods wont Work with Online Productiondatabases and without the Problem of Datalosses, this is only a Way for small and Mediumsize Databases, not for Hugh Databases. Keep in Mind: Backup is NOT Replication! Write it down 100 times and maybe you understand
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: