Re: Patch queue triage
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch queue triage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 464C906D.7010509@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch queue triage ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch queue triage
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Pavan Deolasee wrote: >> >> I suppose inserting HOT tuples without index maintenance is useful >> even if no >> changes to the space allocation is made is useful. It won't get the >> space >> usage but it would save on index thrashing. But that still implies >> all the >> code to handle scans, updates, index builds, etc. Those chunks >> could be >> separated out but you can't commit without them. >> >> There are few things that we can separate easily, like CREATE INDEX >> related changes, VACUUM and VACUUM FULL related changed, space >> reuse related changes etc. Let me give it a shot. > > Did we ever get a broken up patch for this? Yes: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-05/msg00065.php -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: