Re: Patch queue triage
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch queue triage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 464C8F2E.7020103@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch queue triage ("Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch queue triage
Re: Patch queue triage |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Pavan Deolasee wrote: > > I suppose inserting HOT tuples without index maintenance is useful > even if no > changes to the space allocation is made is useful. It won't get the > space > usage but it would save on index thrashing. But that still implies > all the > code to handle scans, updates, index builds, etc. Those chunks could be > separated out but you can't commit without them. > > > > There are few things that we can separate easily, like CREATE INDEX > related changes, VACUUM and VACUUM FULL related changed, space > reuse related changes etc. Let me give it a shot. Did we ever get a broken up patch for this? Joshua D. Drake > > Thanks, > Pavan > > > -- > > EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: