Re: Postgres Server collapse
От | Michael Paesold |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres Server collapse |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 456C024C.6000009@gmx.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres Server collapse (imad <immaad@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres Server collapse
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
imad schrieb: > On 11/27/06, Sistemasvi <sistemasvi@aerogal.com.ec> wrote: >> >> >> Hello. >> >> I have a postsgresql database with max 500 connections. All >> development is >> in Java (View, Model, controller model). The problem is when I have high >> traffic (about 10 AM) when the database server collapse. The server >> turn too >> slow as It haven´t memory and the swap memory increase too much. I >> must kill >> all postgres connections and restart postmaster service. >> >> I have only one connection by web session. It is good or bad? > > One connection only? Then why did you increased the number of connections > to 800? Sorry, I might be missing some point here. Strip "only" to understand the sentence. ;-) Carlos has one open DB connection for each open "web" (i.e. Webbrowser) session, which means that there are way too many connections open for a great number of currently waiting sessions. A connection pool should alleviate the problems. Best Regards Michael Paesold
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: