Re: Postgres Server collapse
От | imad |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres Server collapse |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1f30b80c0611280142p1ad554e0j18cc72f1a2e55810@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres Server collapse (Michael Paesold <mpaesold@gmx.at>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Ok sorry. I missed that "session" thing. --Imad www.EnterpriseDB.com On 11/28/06, Michael Paesold <mpaesold@gmx.at> wrote: > imad schrieb: > > On 11/27/06, Sistemasvi <sistemasvi@aerogal.com.ec> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hello. > >> > >> I have a postsgresql database with max 500 connections. All > >> development is > >> in Java (View, Model, controller model). The problem is when I have high > >> traffic (about 10 AM) when the database server collapse. The server > >> turn too > >> slow as It haven´t memory and the swap memory increase too much. I > >> must kill > >> all postgres connections and restart postmaster service. > >> > >> I have only one connection by web session. It is good or bad? > > > > One connection only? Then why did you increased the number of connections > > to 800? Sorry, I might be missing some point here. > > Strip "only" to understand the sentence. ;-) > > Carlos has one open DB connection for each open "web" (i.e. Webbrowser) > session, which means that there are way too many connections open for a > great number of currently waiting sessions. A connection pool should > alleviate the problems. > > Best Regards > Michael Paesold > >
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: