Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 44E4C4EC.4090109@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: >> Doesn't bugzilla insist on sending you the complete bug every time? >> > > Nope, it just sends the changes/additions. Other than the lack of a > direct email input method, I find BZ quite usable. Josh was just > complaining that its source code is a mess (dunno, haven't looked) > but other than that I think it's a definite possibility, just because > so many people are already familiar with it. > > One other point about BZ - several community members (including me) put in some effort to make the trunk version run on postgres, which it now does, and quite well. So our using it would be a nice return compliment. The source code might well be a mess, but for the most part it can just be treated as a black box. >> Whatever system is used (if one is), there definitly needs to be some >> people looking over what comes in on the mailinglists (or on IRC, for >> that matter) and pipe it off to the tracker in case it's not already >> there. >> > > Sure; we'd need a few volunteers handling that, no matter what software > we pick. > > > You betcha. I'm glad we agree about that. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: